Hi i'm back after a long period of rest! Well not really rest, but nevermind.
This time i will be talking about the roman embassy guy that knocked down 3 people, killed one and sent two into coma. I feel that immunity should NOT even be considered in these type of cases. Why should he be given immunity? If we think of it in simple terms, it is not that hard to come to conclusion.
First let us see the problem, people are deciding if the guy should be granted immunity. But, he was the one driving, he was drinking, and he killed somebody. He killed somebody, took another life. Isn't the outcome the same? Why must we think that " he killed someone in another country"? It is still another person, on this planet, and that man had absolutely no right to take his life, especially because of drink driving.
No comments:
Post a Comment